-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Georg Wrede wrote:
<half jokingly>
> Young people tend to always choose the absolutely best, while older
> people value stability and longevity of tools.
>
> So, yesterday the best was SCons, today it's AAP, what's it gonna be
> tomorrow? Old people prefer something like make, that's been around for
> some time, and which will still be around in the future.
> </>
>
> Yes, it's not /the/ best. But then one doesn't have to learn a new
> system every six months just "to keep with the best".
In a way you're right, but:
- I had been looking for a way around the limitations of make for a
while before I found SCons. In particular:
- No easy way to make cross-platform Makefiles;
- No easy way to track dependencies automatically;
- No easy way to point at a folder and say "take everything in this
folder, compile it, and link it into an executable named foo";
- File date is a poor way to decide that a file must be rebuilt, if
you go back to an archived older version of the file make will miss it;
- No way to use multi-core / multi-CPUs systems (the -j option is
broken).
Now that I found SCons, I look at the others mostly to satisfy my
curiosity. I'm certainly not trying to "keep with the best". But
then, I believe everyone here is curious about new things and
software or we wouldn't be looking at D would we? ;)
Jerome
- --
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAknJOAEACgkQd0kWM4JG3k/gXQCff3oajwj0riRyzh7XQsy/QDqK
UJIAn24ud9n47wGAuRhzHCQnEvzCY+DZ
=zBjm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
