Tomas Lindquist Olsen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Leandro Lucarella <llu...@gmail.com> wrote:
Tomas Lindquist Olsen, el 26 de marzo a las 18:18 me escribiste:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Leandro Lucarella <llu...@gmail.com> wrote:
...snip...
That's why I'd love to see some kind of D 1.1 (maybe LDC could be used to
make an "unofficial" D 1.1 language), with a few minor non-breaking new
features over D 1.0, then D 1.2 could introduce some more, and so on. This
way people can catch-up easly, with small simple iterations, and D1 wont
feel as a dead frozen language.
I think this is bound to happen sooner or later.
Well, then I'd love it happen sooner ;)
We could start by figuring out what D 1.1 is ...
It's D2 - const/invariant, yeaaah! :-P
