Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:30:50 -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > Bill Baxter wrote: >> It seems to me the only people who would know which compilers deserve >> the "stable" label are the folks using dmd on a daily basis to build >> their software. Yet I've never seen the question come up here or >> anywhere else of what version of D the users find to be the most >> stable. My impression is frankly that Walter just arbitrarily slaps >> the label on a rev that's about 10 steps back from current. Probably >> there's more to it than that, but that's what it seems like. > > The current "stable" D1 is that way because it's the one that people > supplied me with a bundled version that has the major libraries > specifically tested and working with it. > > I think that is a fairly reasonable definition of it.
Official stable Tango is bundled with 1.033 for a very long time already.