Christopher Wright wrote: > Nick Sabalausky wrote: >> "Saaa" <em...@needmail.com> wrote in message >> news:gqjjp3$jr...@digitalmars.com... >>>> Who is going to do the work of reviewing these libraries for >>>> compatibility? >>> The people :) >>> like in the wine database. >> >> I would think some of that work could be automated. Of course, setting up >> the automation could mean a fair bit of work... > > You would need an acceptance testing framework. Otherwise you couldn't > tell whether the project does more than compile. > > Granted, for D1 certainly, there have been only few changes that cause > semantic changes without syntactic changes. But in D2, that is not > necessarily the case.
I don't think that is needed to make such a list useful. Even if only some people vote for compatibility with compilers and could post comments, that would be useful to track down the state of affairs.