== Quote from Jarrett Billingsley (jarrett.billings...@gmail.com)'s article > On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Walter Bright > <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > > Paul D. Anderson wrote: > >> > >> b) the features and functions that should be included. > > > > I'd say NaNs and unordered comparisons. In other words, it should support > > the same semantics as float, double and real do. > opUnorderedCmp?
What's wrong with just returning some sentinel from opCmp? For example, define int.max as the sentinel for when comparing with nans involved, etc. For opEquals, we don't have a problem, just return false.
