On Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:17:20 +0100 Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote:
> On 2012-11-07 16:51, Nick Sabalausky wrote: > > > vote++ > > > > It has all the benefits of '@(...)' (which are very compelling on > > their own), but also has the *ONE* benefit of '[...]': Much less > > getting lost in stupid parenthesis, as demonstrated here: > > http://forum.dlang.org/thread/k7afq6$2832$1...@digitalmars.com?page=14#post-puseurlcwbgvigwkdowu:40forum.dlang.org > > This is how that example would look like with my syntax: > > http://pastebin.com/8Ve5KS49 > > I think it looks better in most cases > Well, I'm in favor of the @attr shortcut regardless of @[] vs @().