On 2012-11-08 02:48, Walter Bright wrote:
Consider that if we do that, then someone will need to disambiguate with:
@object.safe
which is ambiguous:
@a.b .c x = 3;
or is it:
@a .b.c x = 3;
?
I would say:
@a.b .c x = 3;
I mean, we read left to right, at least with source code. But as Sönke
said, that could require parentheses:
@(a.b) .c x = 3;
Another problem is it pushes off recognition of @safe from the parser to
the semantic analyzer. This has unknown forward reference complications.
Just make it a keyword? The current attributes are already keywords from
a user/developer point of view.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
