> You could use it, and come up with something else which also > works on x86, etc., but I'd look into storing your weak reference > (or whatever) in a page with the NO_SCAN attribute set. It will > cause the GC to ignore it entirely.
Thanks but that's no option for me, because I need the pointers, to be ignored by the GC, to be in the same page as pointers which should not be ignored. (Actually even in the same struct so they are really neighbors.)
