On Wednesday, 14 November 2012 at 17:31:07 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
Thus, »we«, meaning on a language level, don't need to change anything about the current situations, […]

Let my clarify that: We don't necessarily need to tuck on any extra semantics to the language other than what we currently have. However, what we must indeed do is clarifying/specifying the implicit consensus on which the current implementations are built. We really need a »The D Memory Model«-style document.

David

Reply via email to