On Nov 14, 2012, at 12:01 PM, Sean Kelly <s...@invisibleduck.org> wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:32 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu > <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote: >> >> This is a simplification of what should be going on. The >> core.atomic.{atomicLoad, atomicStore} functions must be intrinsics so the >> compiler generate sequentially consistent code with them (i.e. not perform >> certain reorderings). Then there are loads and stores with weaker >> consistency semantics (acquire, release, acquire/release, and consume). > > No. These functions all contain volatile ask blocks. If the compiler > respected the "volatile" it would be enough. asm blocks. Darn auto-correct.