On 11/23/12, Gor Gyolchanyan <gor.f.gyolchan...@gmail.com> wrote: > It'll take more time trying to extract stuff from Derelict, rather then > regexp search/replace -ing the headers.
You really believe that your regex script is going to do a better job than what Mike has been using and maintaining for years? The same applies to WinAPI, these bindings have been developed and used in years. Introducing new bindings to the same APIs which aren't compatible with existing bindings is just going to create compatibility issues when you use multiple libraries, and it's going to create confusion for new users. Instead of trying to reinvent, why not just contribute to the existing bindings if they're missing functionality or some of their code is outdated? I'll also say that IMO the concept of Deimos turns out to be a bad idea, and I'm not alone in thinking this. Only few people have write access, which means all pull requests have to go through a handful of people who may not even know what the code in the bindings does, and if the devs aren't around you'll have to wait days or even months (see dmd/druntime/phobos) for a pull to be merged. Now some projects use module names without a root (module curses), others encode the deimos name (module deimos.zmq.utils), and then others use their own encoding (module libexif.exif_byte_order). And then you have Walter which merges all pull requests without any review whatsoever. Deimos should have been a wiki page that lists active bindings. And each binding project would have a maintainer or a team of maintainers (who would review pull requests properly). And that's it.