On 2012-11-28 13:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Totally agreed. One issue now is that Walter has converged briskly on
the simplistic conclusion "no more steenking breakages" instead of
learning git and designing a useful process around it. That way the
process remains broken instead of being identified as the main issue and
fixed. I have advocated privately in much stronger terms than I could
afford publicly that we must fix the process and exercise good judgment
about changing the language - all to no avail. "No more breakages" is
like taking an aspirin for the fever caused by gangrene.
I think with dread about what's coming when completing shared will be on
the table. We'll be looking at not breaking code that was by definition
broken.
Thanks again for acknowledging these problems. I do really hope what we
can see some changes in this area.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
