Jonathan M Davis wrote: > Or do you mean something else by the suggestion that the > existence of Walter's pragma can be assumed?
In http://forum.dlang.org/thread/k96hj2$2lus$1...@digitalmars.com? page=4#post-k98o7j:24qb6:241:40digitalmars.com Walter pointed this out for a clique of imports. All but one members of a clique are to have that pragma anyway---and Walter claims, that there is no error introduced, when the remaining member has that pragma too. -manfred