On 03/12/2012 20:17, Rob T wrote:
On Monday, 3 December 2012 at 14:22:28 UTC, Nick Treleaven wrote:
Most programmers would probably just pollute the existing scope:
auto x = "thing" in arr;
if (x && *x == 45)
{
...
}
You can always wrap it inside its own scope
Yes, that's why I wrote:
> I expect this is because wrapping the above in {} for a new scope is
> just too ugly, introducing more nesting and indentation.
;-)
> // temp scope
> {
> auto x = "thing" in arr;
> if (x && *x == 45)
> {
> ...
> }
> }
I would much prefer this:
with (auto x = "thing" in arr)
if (x && *x == 45)
{
...
}
