On 10-12-2012 23:18, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
10.12.2012 20:58, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
On 10-12-2012 10:04, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
06.12.2012 22:40, Alex Rønne Petersen пишет:
Hi,
I decided to take a stab at reviving the new std.process written by
Lars
T. Kyllingstad and Steven Schveighoffer.
The result is here:
https://github.com/alexrp/phobos/tree/new-std-process-update
I decided to extract the work into new commits because rebasing the old
branch in Lars's repo was way too cumbersome after so many months (and
that branch also had a lot of merge commits). The code is obviously not
written by me; all I did was a couple of build and test fixes.
It currently works on 32-bit and 64-bit Linux. It would be great if
someone could take it for a spin on OS X, FreeBSD, and Windows to see
how it fares there (I'm particularly worried that I may have broken the
Windows build).
Lars or Steven, would either of you be willing to go through the review
process with this module? I sent the druntime changes upstream a while
back, so the Phobos changes are really all that remain in order to have
it included.
Please, confirm that such std.process implementation and its
functionality (process and threads listing etc., all what you have in
.Net once finished) is not needed:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/k8v45g$15o6$1...@digitalmars.com
I don't follow?
What is your question?
I already wrote all my reasons in "[RFC] Modules for processes
manipulation" thread linked above. Nobody was interested in. So I want
to be sure my variant is unneeded not just accidentally missed. If I'm
the only person here who would like to see at least every option .Net
Framework offer for process manipulation it's OK and I will stop asking
about it.
No, I think there are a lot of people who want this. D is basically
useless for scripting work because of its poor process manipulation support.
But keep in mind that your module is very Windows-centric and most
people who deal with shell scripting work are on POSIX systems (a
generalization, of course, but mostly true). I think that's why you
didn't get much input.
--
Alex Rønne Petersen
a...@lycus.org
http://lycus.org
