On Wednesday, 19 December 2012 at 13:13:32 UTC, David Nadlinger
wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 December 2012 at 07:14:30 UTC, Rob T wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 December 2012 at 01:58:54 UTC, Jonathan M
Davis wrote:
Such operations should be @system but are currently
considered @safe. Who
knows how many others we've missed beyond what's currently in
bugzilla.
- Jonathan M Davis
Unfortunately fixing these will break existing code, or can
the behavior be depreciated?
We *must* take the liberty to fix them; if SafeD is not sound,
it's hardly worth its salt.
David
Don't get me wrong, I agree that broken behavior must always be
fixed and never left in as a "feature".
Probably the priority bugs should be the ones where the fix ends
up breaking existing code. The sooner these are gotten rid of the
better.
--rt