On 12/21/2012 8:38 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
The reason it is that way is to avoid having it behave gratuitously differently than how visibility works within classes and structs.??? I don't see anything here that would become different between user-defined types and modules. All we're really asking for here is that inaccessible symbols not be put in overload sets.
But they are in structs in classes (following the way C++ does it).
