On Thursday, January 03, 2013 01:25:17 Dmitry Olshansky wrote: > What do you think?
Hmmm. Typically the thing that you really want to know is which portions were true and which were false, and this doesn't help with that at all. What it does is make the errors more understandable for newbies, which is good. But for those of use who know more, they'd actually be annoying I think, because what I really want to know is what the actual constraint was so that I can figure out what's wrong. But I'm likely to look at the source for that anyway, since it's far more legible there than it is the error message. So, this could be a good idea in that it could make the errors more understandable for newbies, but it still really doesn't help tell you what's wrong, which is what you really want to know. It just tries to translate the constraint into English. So, I don't know. I'm not opposed to the idea, but I'm not exactly sold on it either. Certainly, I don't think that it would benefit me, personally, at all, but it may be worth it for newbies. - Jonathan M Davis