Am Fri, 04 Jan 2013 07:59:05 +0100 schrieb "Rob T" <r...@ucora.com>:
> > You did mention that (1) is more suitable for beta testers, so I > ask how is (2) not as suitable? With (1) you can always use staging, it'll always be the latest beta. With (2) you'll have to figure out the most recent branch (2.061, 2.062, 2.063). But I think we can start with (2) and change to (1) later if we think it's useful. Staging complicates the concept(on a cognitive level) and it needs additional "human resources" to do the merges into it. I think I understand the whole concept now. I seems to be a good solution but it requires some discipline (basing changes on the correct branches) so we should document it as clearly as possible. I'd strongly recommend to only base regression fixes on release branches and usual bug fixes on master (see my other message).