On Saturday, 19 January 2013 at 13:57:02 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 1/19/13 8:21 AM, Maxim Fomin wrote:
How much chances does this program have?
Looks like an ODR violation, but oddly there's nothing stopping
us from making this work. It's a good idea to pursue.
Andrei
Unfortunately, this will never work in general. That code runs
because private member was placed after public and because
_d_new_class got "right" Typeinfo (compiled from mylib, not from
main). If a private member is placed before a public one, than
this will lead to troubles because dmd just generates (wrong)
offsets from base pointer.
What I wanted to say is that in D private members should be
included in declaration in general case (sometimes the opposite
may work by chance) which partly defeats encapsulation.
For example, if you make changes in class which affects order of
private members, you have to recompile all code which uses that
class. That is a poor encapsulation.
