On Thursday, January 24, 2013 01:33:29 Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > If you find this not wanting and not improvable we might have reached an > irreducible position.
I think that it's been clear for some time that there's no way to please both the folks who want strong property enforcement and those who want weak property enforcement. One side is going to lose out, and much as I'm very much in favor strong property enforcement (and Nick clearly is as well), I think that it's fairly clear at this point that the majority of folks arond here are not (in great part due to UFCS). Not to mention, sorting out proper property enforcement has taken so long given all of the other priorities, that doing strong property enforcement would probably break quite a lot of code at this point. - Jonathan M Davis
