On 1/24/13 8:38 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 24 January 2013 08:34, Walter Bright <newshou...@digitalmars.com <mailto:newshou...@digitalmars.com>> wrote:This has turned into a monster. We've taken 2 or 3 wrong turns somewhere. Perhaps we should revert to a simple set of rules. 1. Empty parens are optional. If there is an ambiguity with the return value taking (), the () go on the return value. 2. the: f = g rewrite to: f(g) only happens if f is a function that only has overloads for () and (one argument). No variadics. 3. Parens are required for calling delegates or function pointers. 4. No more @property. As much as I want to agree, I also feel this comes as too little, too late to come to this conclusion now.
Too little is a good thing actually! Andrei
