On Friday, January 25, 2013 11:09:15 kenji hara wrote: > That is more serious than (a). If we adopt this rule, we will *really* > get lost the way to distinguish property functions and raw data fields. > (Note that: In current typeof(foo) already returns int. So AddressExp is > only one way to getting (normal|property) function information by its > type.) From the view of meta-programming, I think this makes a serious flaw.
We could add a __trait which detected whether a field was an actual variable or not. - Jonathan M Davis
