On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 11:00:34 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 01:55, kenji hara wrote:
I can imagine a situation that we might not want to treat
property
functions as DATAs simply.
If you have a struct which have some property functions as
members, and
you'd want to serialize it:
struct S {
int value_;
@property int value() { return value_; }
}
At least, the serialization library should recognize the
S.value is a
_property function_, not a int DATA.
A serialization library would only recognize "value_" since
it's an instance variable.
getFields/getProperties/getMethods and you are done. It don't
sounds that much of a problem to me.
