On Friday, 25 January 2013 at 13:52:37 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-01-25 14:26, mist wrote:Hm, shouldn't it be processed like that: 1) evaluate "f = 3", setter called 2) evaluate "(f = 3)" -> evaluate "f" -> getter called 3) evaluate "auto i = ", setter called ?Yes, but why would a setter be called at step 3?
Was thinking about i setter, did not pay attention it is actually a new declaration :) Never mind.
