"Georg Wrede" <georg.wr...@iki.fi> wrote in message news:guqdmn$1tk...@digitalmars.com... > Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: >> >> I therefore submit that "with" is an extremely dangerous feature and >> should be removed from the language. What say you? > > Non-touch typers will riot.
I'm not a touch-typer, but I've never seen much of a point to "with". If I have to access a bunch of members of "foo.member.x.bar[17].fizzle", I'll just do "auto fizz = foo.member.x.bar[17].fizzle;" and use that, or put it into a function that takes a "typeof(fizze)", or do something else along those lines. I've yet to come across a case where something like that isn't perfectly sufficient.
