On Wednesday, 30 January 2013 at 11:10:17 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Currently you are allowed to write a lambda literal as in line 3, but you can't omit "ref" as in line 4:


void foo(int delegate(ref int[1]) spam) {}
void main() {
    foo((ref x) => 0); // line3, OK
    foo(x => 0); // line4, Error
}


Do you think "ref" annotation should be required at the call site?

This is the Bugzilla thread. Hara has already implemented the "ref" inference, but he's not sure if it's a good idea:

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9423

Bye,
bearophile

I like it.
Would be a good time to require this for normal functions and methods also. As C# it does.

Reply via email to