On Saturday, 2 February 2013 at 18:47:37 UTC, TommiT wrote:
On Saturday, 2 February 2013 at 17:56:41 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
On Saturday, 2 February 2013 at 06:19:29 UTC, TommiT wrote:
On Saturday, 2 February 2013 at 03:50:49 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
[..]
What do you suppose would happen if I wrote the following?
struct A
{
struct B {}
B b1;
B b2;
}
void main()
{
A a;
assert(&a.b1 == &a.b2);
}
With my new rules? It would be illegal to take the address of
a struct which contained no data.
Yes, that is kind of what I was getting at with my question.
But I'm going to ask the same thing in a better way now:
Given your new nested struct variable behaviour and my
definition of struct 'A' quoted above, would the following
lines compile?
static assert( A.B.sizeof == 0 );
static assert( A.sizeof == 0 );
Yes, I believe so. I don't see why not.
