On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> Final switch works with enums and forces you to handle each and every value > of the enum. Regular switch gets ranged cases by the syntax case a: .. case > b: (I've always thought switch would be greatly helped by that). Kind of an odd syntax. Why not "case a .. b:"? Parsing issues? > Static foreach might be making it too. That'd be a nice addition. Especially with __traits returning arrays/tuples, it'd be an alternative to CTFE (shudder) or template recursion.
