On 2013-02-07 09:19, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
That's way I originally chose Ruby, because it can look just like JSON:foo = { a: 3, b: 4 }
This looks like JSON but doesn't look like Ruby. :)
On 2013-02-07 09:19, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
That's way I originally chose Ruby, because it can look just like JSON:foo = { a: 3, b: 4 }
This looks like JSON but doesn't look like Ruby. :)