On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:55:01 -0500, Jonathan M Davis <jmdavisp...@gmx.com>
wrote:
On Thursday, February 07, 2013 16:12:34 Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 15:25:57 -0500, Jonathan M Davis
<jmdavisp...@gmx.com>
wrote:
> struct S
> {
>
> @property int i;
>
> }
struct S
{
mixin(boilerplateProperty("i"));
}
I don't see this as a difficult problem to solve.
Except that mixins are generally unacceptable in APIs, because they
don't end
up in the documentation. That means that this works only if you don't
care
about documentation. So, it's almost useless. Putting @property on there
also
looks better but isn't that big a deal. However, the lack of
documentation
_is_ a big deal.
True. But we can fix that just as easily (will ddoc currently parse
mixin-generated docs? If not it should).
-Steve
