On Saturday, 9 February 2013 at 15:52:04 UTC, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
Am 09.02.2013 16:40, schrieb kenji hara:

You can use built-in 'tupleof' property, which still bypass access
modifier.


Will they continue to do so, or will this also be fixed? We should at least have some way to do low level work like serialization.

Kind Regards
Benjamin Thaut

According to my private-related DIP - yes, they will continue, and there have been no objections on this part.

Reply via email to