On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:14:29 -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu
<seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"Leandro Lucarella" <llu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:20090518141908.gb9...@burns.springfield.home...
bearophile, el 18 de mayo a las 04:33 me escribiste:
Andrei, I agree that "with" is dangerous when it shadows outer names
(Python designers have not added a "with" because of this).
They did, but with different semantics =)
It's used for RAII (I guess you already know that, but maybe other
people
don't).
You mean like C#'s "using"?
What a God awful feature. Honestly, "what were they sinking about?"
People who explained that C# is cool - please explain this one.
Had to look it up, never used it.
Not sure it's that terrible, it looks to be the equivalent in D of:
{
scope C = new C();
...
}
I suppose it's good in cases where you want to have somewhat manual memory
management. Does seem poorly named though.
-Steve
