On Wednesday, 6 February 2013 at 21:40:00 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/6/13 3:02 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
Also the DIP argues that addressOf solves the @property issue
w.r.t.
return values. I've proposed we use an .addressOf property
which only
works on @property functions, and I saw no arguments against
it.
There aren't, but a library approach is better than a magic
work, all other things being equal.
Andrei
struct S
{
@property int var();
@property void var(int);
}
The .addressOf property gave me the idea of solving the
getter/setter issue, by having two properties...
var.getter
var.setter
maybe it could be added to your library approach though?
