Bill Baxter: > Agreed. If you tell someone a .. b means a non-inclusive range > from a to b, then ask them to guess what blarf a .. blarf b means, > I would be very surprised if many guessed "inclusive range from blarf > a to blarf b".
Thank you for nicely expressing one of the critics I was trying to express. (My other problem is that I'd like a more general syntax). ------------------------ A different simple solution can be: case a .. b+1: That requires no new syntax. Bye, bearophile
