grauzone wrote:
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"grauzone" <n...@example.net> wrote in message
news:guqrj2$2l7...@digitalmars.com...
Here's another simple fix for with();
int x, y;
with (whatever)
{
.y += x; //.y references this is whatever.y
++x; //x references local scope
}
That already means global scope.
Yes, but who uses that anyway?
There's that perennial annoyance that class methods with a given name
hide free functions of the same name, even if they are not covariant.
This crops up a lot with toString, and the fix is to prepend a dot to
the invocation.
