On 2/17/13, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/17/13, Nick Sabalausky <seewebsitetocontac...@semitwist.com> wrote: >> Hmm, that brings up a different (though minor) issue: If it's a >> warning, why does it say "Error"? > > I can see in the source there's a check for the -w flag but then an > error is raised by mistake. This should either be an error regardless > of -w or be changed into a warning. >
Well the OP sample might also be a rejects-valid. So there's 2 bugs here.
