23-Feb-2013 15:31, Lars T. Kyllingstad пишет:
It's been years in the coming, but we finally got it done. :) The upshot
is that the module has actually seen active use over those years, both
by yours truly and others, so hopefully the worst wrinkles are already
ironed out.
Pull request:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1151
Code:
https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-process2/std/process2.d
Documentation:
http://www.kyllingen.net/code/std-process2/phobos-prerelease/std_process2.html
I hope we can get it reviewed in time for the next release. (The wiki
page indicates that both std.benchmark and std.uni are currently being
reviewed, but I fail to find any "official" review threads on the
forum. Is the wiki just out of date?)
Cool. I was about to suggest that now, since release is out we can
hopefully start the review process.
As far as std.uni & std.benchmark goes:
Some time ago std.benchmark was again collectively destroyed and/or
Andrei hadn't enough time to incorporate feedback. This was back in 2012
IRC. This is the last thread I can dig up:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.73.1347916419.5162.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
Then (in 2013) std.uni seen an informal destruction, had its docs
re-written and was proposed again. Not much comments received after
that, as people were fighting over @property stuff.
This is the first thread about it:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/kcppa1$30b9$1...@digitalmars.com
The second one:
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ke9gat$rg0$1...@digitalmars.com
I'd suggest we start with anything that's ready and the sooner the
better. Now with std.process proposed for review I'm aware of 2 modules
being ready, any others?
--
Dmitry Olshansky
