26-Feb-2013 11:20, Jacob Carlborg пишет:
On 2013-02-25 19:21, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
What can I say Phobos is an example of software evolution ;)
Is the new std.uni completely backwards compatible with the old one.
Otherwise we have the same problem as with std.process. But in this case
we have another name that is actually better.
It is backwards compatible and was created to be a drop in replacement
as one of its requirements. In any case the API of std.uni is small and
simple enough to keep it as is.
I'm having some problem understanding the obsession in shortening names,
even when the full name isn't particular long.
Let's not go there. And uni is not obsession at all. POSIX 'O_CREAT' is.
--
Dmitry Olshansky
