On 02/27/2013 03:30 AM, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 February 2013 at 21:01:04 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:On 02/26/2013 05:16 PM, deadalnix wrote:... As usual, destroy, I don't expect to get unanimity on that. But I tried very hard to get most benefit of actual situation, including the possibility of optional parentheses in some situations (even if I'm not the biggest fan of it, I recognize that they are nice).If breaking code is an option, this is almost fine. Change the optional parens part to "optional parentheses are valid for CTFE calls", and you might have me on board. It is also simpler, less ad-hoc, and easier to implement than what the DIP currently states.Can you elaborate on that ? I'm not 100M satisfied with that part of the DIP, where I see everything else as a major improvement over current situation.
I'm not sure why elaboration would be necessary.
Remove the optional parens part, then:
int foo(int x){ ... }
2.foo // <- no meaning assigned by your DIP, make it a function call
