On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 07:01:20PM -0800, Walter Bright wrote: > On 3/1/2013 6:55 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > >On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 02:35:34 UTC, Walter Bright wrote: > >>On 3/1/2013 7:43 AM, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >>>Wow. You make me feel really lucky that at my day job, I once made > >>>a request to use a particular piece of open source software, and > >>>the legal department actually replied with "the license is MIT, it > >>>should be OK, approved." > >> > >>This is exactly why we are using a well-known license, rather than > >>rolling our own. > > > > > >Anyway the DDMD maintainer was asked about the license in 2010, he > >never picked one but it seemed like he was open to anything: > >http://www.dsource.org/forums/viewtopic.php?p=25763#25763 > > I'd recommend Boost or GPL. Anyhow, it's a pity to see his work go to > waste because of no license.
I would personally go for GPL, but it does scare certain companies off -- I've personally witnessed that. Just FWIW. T -- Computers aren't intelligent; they only think they are.