bearophile wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I don't plan to discuss minor features on this group anymore.

In about two years I've never heard Walter say something like that
(even if may think similar things every day), he doesn't need a
pedestal.

This has nothing to do with a pedestal. It's simple pragmatics. We are fulfilling Wadler's law (http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Wadlers_Law) around here, and that's counterproductive.

Some of language design and most of syntax design are subjective. We all have a tendency to subjectively prefer features that we created and to be more critical of features that others have created. It's natural. They call it the better-than-average bias (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Wobegon_effect). I have that tendency as much as the next guy, but I also like to believe I do not let that mask my reasoning too bad. That is, I wouldn't go at any length to defend a no-win case and argue against others while at the same time consistently ignoring any explanation given several times and in several forms.

Case in point: omitting the trailing parens in function calls... I got destroyed on that one :o).


Andrei

Reply via email to