On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 21:46:49 UTC, Era Scarecrow wrote:
On Saturday, 2 March 2013 at 08:29:25 UTC, Namespace wrote:
Era Scarecrow:
Did I understand right that your answer is 'No, we don't need
something like const&'?
const& is ugly and suggests it is using a pointer which we
don't want to use except in low level stuff. const& doesn't
make sense, but 'auto ref' does, and I think it could be quite
useful.
Yes, something similar to "auto ref" was meant by "_something_
like const&", of course. ;)
