Tim Matthews Wrote: > On Wed, 20 May 2009 15:01:44 +1200, Jeremie Pelletier <jerem...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I think it is so the parser knows how to make the difference between the > > template symbol and an instance symbol. > > > > > Can you explain a bit more on this? function templates dont require this > by the way and I didn't think a template could ever be 'newed'
Oh yeah you are right, it has already been filed as a bug.