On Thursday, 21 March 2013 at 16:37:38 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:08:00PM +0100, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
Since (IIRC) all issues regarding incompatibility with
std.process
have been resolved, how about renaming the module to
std.process?
This way it'll also be easier to test backwards-compatibility
in
existing programs.
+1. I hate std.process2 with a passion. Let's keep it as
std.process.
The main reason I created a separate std.process2 was in fact not
that I intended to keep it that way, but because I kept getting
merge conflicts whenever I merged in Phobos master.
If you all don't mind, I'd like to keep it separate until we are
satisfied that the API is stable.
Lars
