On Thu, 21 May 2009 17:40:27 -0400, Jason House
<jason.james.ho...@gmail.com> wrote:
Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
So what I think we may need is a different range primitive:
An iterable range defines: (name to be decided)
bool empty()
T popNext()
An input range is an iterable range that also defines:
T front();
popFront();
This is exactly like what Andrei posted as his design.
Your iterable range = Andrei's input range
Your input range = Andrei's forward range
If that's true, then I apologize, I was looking at the current docs, and
Andrei's post about having some sort of "save" method. The current docs
definitely are not the same as what I proposed.
And in any case, my proposal requires a change to the compiler for
foreach. I haven't seen that talked about yet. If that's in the works,
then that's cool. As I've said before, I don't need credit, I just like
to have the ideas knocked around.
-Steve
