On Saturday, March 30, 2013 22:12:30 bearophile wrote: > Kagamin: > > Jonathan M Davis wrote: > >> because if it > >> doesn't, you're forced to cast all over the place > > > > There are so many implicit conversions between signed and > > unsigned? Are they all ok? > > I think Jonathan doesn't have enough proof that forbidding > signed<->unsigned implicit casts in D is worse than the current > situation that allows them.
Walter is the one that you have to convince, and I don't think that that's ever going to happen. - Jonathan M Davis
