Re: Request for review - std.serialization (orange)

[Kagamin]

On Sunday, 31 March 2013 at 17:33:28 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-03-31 12:40, Kagamin wrote:
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/0f7d8219

So instead Serializer gets a huge API?

The point is to have Serializer as an encapsulation point, not 
archiver. API can remain the same, it's just calls to the 
archiver are to be routed through Serializer's virtual methods, 
not archiver's.