On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:50:22 -0400 Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> On 4/1/13 11:21 AM, Denis Shelomovskij wrote: > > 01.04.2013 0:02, monarch_dodra пишет: > >> This is a two part post. > >> > >> The reason I'm worried about this bug is that the only condition > >> that seems to trigger it passing an object that has a destructor. > >> I find this is very bothersome, because it can happen with > >> perfectly safe code, and its "observable condition" is perfectly > >> undefined. Finally, it only appears in -O, biting you in the ass > >> in the worst possible moment. > > > > Nothing personal, I do respect you, but > > > > Bitch please! > [snip] > > Denis, the above (as well as most of the message that follows) is > entirely inappropriate. It's also compounded by your antics on > github, where your contributions are marred by a tendency to bully > other contributors and to convert most every disagreement into > strife. I have repeatedly asked you kindly to correct that behavior > to no effect. > > Remember, nobody's holding a gun to your head; the door is always > open for entering as well as leaving. It is entirely understandable > if you find D unfit for whatever you do, or if its development > process is not to your satisfaction. But this ongoing attitude of > playing the victim, interpreting the team's shortcomings as > incompetence doubled by malice, and picking fights left and right, is > not helping you or anybody. > > I compel you again to revise your attitude toward the people you work > and interact with in the forum and on github. If that does not > happen, I will propose to the core team that your github account is > banned from our project. Sorry it had to come to this. > Geez. It just sounded like a reasonable expression of frustration to me. *I've* said shit on here that was *far* less level-headed. More than once. But then, I never said anything implying an inability to use D reliably. So I can't help wondering if there's some PR-motivated bias here. Well, ok, I *do* realize there probably isn't, but when you respond with the threat of a ban to a fairly reasonable post about frustrations from having major trouble with the language, then first of all, that overreacting, but worse: people can easily misconstrue that as an attempt to sweep real problems things under the rug. I know nobody's trying to do that, but we definitely don't want people thinking we are. And that definitely makes it look like we are.