On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 10:39:20 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 09:54:30 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 11 April 2013 17:57, Paulo Pinto <pj...@progtools.org>
wrote:
Am 11.04.2013 17:20, schrieb John Colvin:
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 at 15:15:09 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 4/11/13, Jonas Drewsen <nospam4...@hotmail.com> wrote:
By "I think that would be the way to go" I did not
necessary
refer to having both formats supported at the same time but
simply to use the standard way that people know.
Unix != universal standard.
Next best thing.
Actually I would like to know how the desktop world would
look like
had Apple bought BeOS instead.
This would mean no UNIX on the desktop, assuming Apple would
have
won a similar market as of today.
--
Paulo
Linux would have still taken off... and UNIX would still be
relevant on the
server market. :)
Not to mention supercomputers. There's a reason why they use(d)
UNIX and linux and it's not because of apple.
Sure but I was speaking about the home market, not the server
market.
Then people would need to bash both Apple and Microsoft for not
being UNIX like.
Although I like UNIX architecture, it is not the be all end all
of operating system architecture.
I was lucky enough to play with various OS so far.
--
Paulo
